-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.13.7-slim to 3.14.1-slim #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174592 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174592 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174602 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174602 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174605
Summary of ChangesHello @doublegate, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, updates the Python base image used in the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR attempts to upgrade the Python Docker base image from 3.13.7-slim to 3.14.1-slim to address 3 OpenSSL-related security vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-9230, CVE-2025-9231, CVE-2025-9232) in the Debian 13 base image.
Key Changes:
- Updates Python base image version in both builder and runtime stages of the Dockerfile
- Targets OpenSSL vulnerability mitigation through base image upgrade
Critical Issue: Python 3.14.1 does not exist as a released version as of January 2025, making this upgrade invalid and non-functional.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codex Review
OctoLLM/services/arms/judge/Dockerfile
Line 41 in cd6a12b
| COPY --from=builder /usr/local/lib/python3.13/site-packages /usr/local/lib/python3.13/site-packages |
Builder and runtime bases were bumped to python:3.14.1-slim, but the multi-stage copy still pulls /usr/local/lib/python3.13/site-packages. In a 3.14 image that path does not exist, so docker build will fail at this COPY step (no source directory) whenever the judge image is built after this upgrade. Update the copy to the 3.14 site-packages path to restore a working build.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades the Python base image in services/arms/judge/Dockerfile from 3.13.7-slim to 3.14.1-slim to fix security vulnerabilities. While the upgrade is necessary, the current implementation will break the Docker build due to a hardcoded path for site-packages that references the old Python version. I've left a critical comment on how to fix this. Additionally, I've noticed that several other Python-based services in this repository (coder, planner, retriever, safety-guardian, orchestrator) use a similar Dockerfile structure with hardcoded Python version paths. These will also need to be updated to prevent similar issues in the future and to maintain consistency. It would be beneficial to address these in a systematic way, perhaps by using an ARG for the Python version in all Dockerfiles.
| # syntax=docker/dockerfile:1 | ||
| # Judge Arm Dockerfile - Multi-stage build for Python service | ||
| FROM python:3.13.7-slim as builder | ||
| FROM python:3.14.1-slim as builder |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This version upgrade will break the Docker build. The COPY instruction on line 41 uses a hardcoded path with the old Python version (3.13) for both the source (from this builder stage) and the destination (in the runtime stage defined on line 26).
# services/arms/judge/Dockerfile:41
COPY --from=builder /usr/local/lib/python3.13/site-packages /usr/local/lib/python3.13/site-packagesWith the base images updated to python:3.14.1-slim, the site-packages directory will be at /usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages. The COPY instruction will fail because the source path /usr/local/lib/python3.13/site-packages will not exist in the builder stage.
To fix this, the version number in the path on line 41 must be updated to 3.14 for both source and destination.
A better long-term solution would be to use an ARG for the Python version to avoid this kind of issue in the future. For example:
ARG PYTHON_VERSION_SHORT=3.14
ARG PYTHON_VERSION_FULL=3.14.1
FROM python:${PYTHON_VERSION_FULL}-slim as builder
...
COPY --from=builder /usr/local/lib/python${PYTHON_VERSION_SHORT}/site-packages /usr/local/lib/python${PYTHON_VERSION_SHORT}/site-packagesThis way, you only need to update the ARGs at the top of the file.
Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.
Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.
Snyk changed the following file(s):
services/arms/judge/DockerfileWe recommend upgrading to
python:3.14.1-slim, as this image has only 23 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174592
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174592
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174602
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174602
SNYK-DEBIAN13-OPENSSL-13174605
Important
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.